Heritage, Soil, and Transcendental
Simplicity
By Joe McCarthy
Western massified man with his reliance on
the latest technological breakthroughs and over-emphasis on base consumerism
has little conception of the extreme changes that have accompanied what he
now views as the normative conditions of the modern world. What Alvin
Toffler called the "accelerative thrust" [1] has brought on a deluge of
change that dwarfs the periodic innovations that occurred at various times
in pre-modern history. Change, at previous junctures a novelty, is now a
norm that not only radically alters the world in which we live, but the
tempo of change itself is ever quickening. This process can only work to
undercut man's relation to traditional notions as such notions are becoming
archaic. Whereas our ancestors found solace and normalcy in rootedness and
patria, the modern zeitgest has enthroned the disposable
culture. Seldom is it that things are built to last - whether they be razors
or values. In a world where the only constant is change, those that
desperately seek to cling to the mores of yesteryear find it increasingly
difficult to cope. They are experiencing "future shock." [2]
Unfortunately, the posture of the reactionary,
if it was ever realistic, certainly isn't now. The rapid pace at which new
technologies and lifestyles come upon us makes the stubborn, reflexive
hostility preferred by many an option that is simply unworkable. Hope is found
not in dogmatically resisting the inevitable but in working to mold and guide
already visible trends into something approaching a more desirable end. A
second option, which serves as the main topic of this treatise, is to work to
cast aside the rat race and disengage.
While it is not the purpose of this writer to
downplay, or worse, attack the technological underpinnings of present society,
what is clear is that western man has become divorced from what is arguably
his true nature and natural habitat. That Westerners are essentially rural
beings is something that Jack London persuasively showed, [3] and a greater
appreciation for those traditions and cultural precepts is found far easier in
a setting in which one returns to the soil, eschewing the cosmopolitan ethos
of the city, and emphasizing a more centered life of simplicity devoid of
soulless eudaemonism. A Burkean outlook on life, looking to family, community,
and nation is antithetical to the mass decadent consumer state of Big Macs and
bimbos. It seeks to honor the achievements of the past and those who came
before, not put primary emphasis on the NYSE or reduce one's existence to
watching degenerate misfits on daytime trash television. To be close to one's
roots, to cherish and preserve the works of the great men of the past is of
lasting and critical import; for as Arthur Schopenhauer observed, greatness,
not happiness is our ideal. And even happiness should be on a higher plane,
not sink into the muck of utilitarian "pig morality."
Although unimaginable to the fast paced
suburbanites of today, previous epochs of Western civilization were
not characterized by the rampant materialism now current. Especially advanced
civilizations such as ancient Athens were noted more for philosophical
introspection and a life of settled ease. [4] While the Athenians were not
averse to labor, they were not so consumed by it that they neglected the
higher pursuits that make for a truly cultured society. When one considers
Attica, and its comparatively miniscule population to the high octane
metropolises of today, one finds that bigger is not always better. Truly,
quality is seen to trump quantity in the evaluation. The gap in intellectual
accomplishments between the former and the latter is stark. The
transcendentalist and naturalist, Henry David Thoreau, in emulating this
ancient pattern, sought to show that endless labor and pursuit of the almighty
dollar were essentially pointless endeavors; that man's existence requires a
more meaningful, soul fulfilling exercise. To Thoreau, being was finding one's
self in the solitude of nature, away from the hustle and bustle of the urban
quagmire. While it was perhaps not his intention, his Walden can
serve as a new anthem and part of the basis for a new de-massified man
stressing an outlook on life that looks to the rural, if not in fact,
certainly in spirit. "Simplicity, simplicity, simplicity!" [5]
In considering the process of disengagement it
is instructive to review some of the proposals heretofore offered which in
some manner touch upon our subject. Perhaps foremost in this field are the
works of the utopians, which while flawed insofar as they propose some
variation on socialist organization, nevertheless provide insight into an
alternative form of social arrangement. Thomas More and B.F. Skinner
explored the possibilities of like minded people cooperating in what were
essentially counter-communities cut off from the mainstream. Isolated, largely
self-sufficient redoubts living peacefully yet independently give some hope of
escape from a world gone mad. That such communities have been able to operate
more or less under the radar of state scrutiny for millennia gives practical,
real life evidence that surviving Ragnarok is doable. Of course, not
everyone is likely to join a commune, but the fact that non-socialist
communities of such a character are already in existence serves to temper the
hesitancy of those not likely to go 'retro' and don Birkenstocks and bell
bottoms. In Utopia, More employed what has since become a literary
mainstay - the island paradise as an outlet for the discontented. The concept
of island settlements naturally conjures up scenes out of The Swiss Family
Robinson and similar fare, but fantasy can easily be transposed
into reality. Even though this has been a sparsely used option, it is not hard
to imagine a group of disgruntled traditionalists pooling resources and
'starting over'. Skinner's Walden Two outlines a somewhat less
unconventional framework in that it describes a self-contained grouping
operating within the confines of a nation-state. In Skinner's work, the
community even manages to acquire political clout by continually attracting
more and more dispirited moderns looking for an escape hatch.
Neither of these patterns are necessarily
recommended, for it must be admitted that they are somewhat in the realm of
idyllic visions; and they are certainly unsuitable for many, who for sundry
reasons simply lack the opportunity to radically transform their lifestyles.
What they do provide however is a sort of thought experiment in the arena of
ideas, and an intellectual yardstick by which options can be weighed and acted
upon.
Whatever the road taken this much is clear: The
purpose of the new man will be to withdraw from what is clearly a civilization
in the throes of what Sorokin called "sensate culture." He must ask for more
than the omnipresent ignorance so prevalent. He must study, prepare himself,
and look to transcend beyond the notions of Aristippus. Out of the ashes of
the old, the new man of the West will find that his struggle is well worth the
effort.
Notes
1. Toffler's theory that change itself (or more
importantly, the rapidly increased tempo at which change now occurs) has
wreaked havoc on what were formerly static norms is given too little attention
by those concerned with more traditional modes of living in an ethnic context.
See Alvin Toffler, Future Shock (New York: Bantam Books, 1990.)
2. Ibid.
3. Jack London, The Valley of the Moon
(Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999.)
4. For insight into the easygoing lifestyle of
the ancient Greeks and the Athenians in particular, see C.M. Bowra,
Classical Greece (New York: Time-Life Books, 1965.)
5. Henry David Thoreau, Walden and "Civil
Disobedience", Signet Classic edition (New York: Penguin Books,
1980), p. 66.